In the last year I've built, broke, shot, tested and abused a few bows. I am constantly challenging my bows to stand up to cruel and unusual punishment. Thus far, I have not had any bow fail during normal usage, nor during "extra-normal" usage!

With that said, I stand behind my products and offer a 1 year full and two year pro-rated warranty on materials and workmanship to the original owner.

When you talk about arrow speed with a bunch of traditional bow shooters, you can expect to hear a broad array of opinions. Some will praise the fastest bows, others will shun speed, naming it as the nemesis of shootability, and some will reasonably praise a fast and shootable bow.
Another issue to address is the standardization of bow testing. In order to test various bows performance, they each have to be tested with exacting specifications. The same draw length, same arrow weight relative to bow draw weight (grains per pound), same string weight, material and construction, as well as release method.
In running bows through a chronograph I've seen wild fluctuations in arrow speeds from the same bow: from 161 fps with 10 gpp, 16 strand B50 shot with fingers to 195 fps @ 8 gpp, 8 strand D97 shot with release.
My point is, unless you know all the specifications of a test, dont put too much stock into it.
I've ran many of my bows through a chronograph over the last year. I am going to construct a table below that will show results and test specifications. I am very pleased with the mix of high speed and shootability these bows posess. And contrary to the speed critics protests, my fastest bows exhibit the best shooting qualities. I've heard this same testimonial from a number of other bowyers that spend a lot of hours figuring out how to make an arrow "go faster".